Right now, a trove of valuable data exists on ACC.com, waiting for you to exploit it.

Great in-house lawyers, faced with an upheaval in technology, keep calm and don’t fall in love with the first solution. They look to the fundamental aspects of their work and their clients’ needs. They take a deep breath and never panic.

This month’s issue of ACC Docket dives into the world of international business, technology, and dispute resolution. In these pages, you’ll find the latest thinking on blockchain contracts, new multinational tax rules, and the continued development of international arbitration.

Litigation is our moment to shine. This month’s issue of the ACC Docket focuses on this critical opportunity.

Here, you will find the latest practical advice on non-competes, independent contractors, workers’ compensation, employee investigations, and cutting-edge views on worker surveillance.

To get started, set your browser to acc.com and begin clicking through the pages. The resource packs and presentations, including video and audio recordings, will satisfy the appetite of any in-house lawyer.

Even when we are alone, our inner circle of friends affects our perspective and choices.

SP2.0 is all about your credibility: education, certification, networking, expansion, and connections, tailored to your personal needs. The goal of SP2.0 is not to make ACC great, but to make you great and to help you build credibility as a professional.

Writing for the Docket has been a satisfying and fun experience. I want to continue, but I really have to stop. My muse has died.

“Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response.”

So the next time you think the judge is an idiot, feel free to speak your mind. A computer won’t take offense.

Philosophers find lawyers very frustrating. Coming up with alternative endings is not permitted in Trolley Problems, but it is instructive. It shows how difficult the underlying dilemma really is.

The 360-review is just one of multiple surveys, questionnaires, and requests for input that hit us every day.

The barrier of tacit knowledge in computers, it seems, is not a barrier at all. But will robot “lawyers” soon take all our jobs?

Human resource experts and behavioral psychologists have written volumes on how to control, manage, or escape bad bosses.

The staff at ACC have just launched their new online whistleblower hotline.

Efficient communication is hard work.

You will usually create a more positive impression if you speak instead of write.

In-house lawyers must embrace their ignorance. It would be foolish, even unethical, to hold ourselves out as experts on every topic.

We are fast approaching the end of 2015 with a tinge of holiday expectation. For the most part, it is a wonderful time of year.

Big data is enormously useful, but to ignore the way humans rely on the “easy answers” of big data can be dangerous.

Cold fusion is a fascinating story, like other examples of bad science, because they are so rare. We should be so lucky to have such rare mistakes in our own professional lives.

The advice we give is limited by the information we have, information that is inherently biased even if we have seen it with our own eyes.

When it comes to intelligence and groups, the whole is often less than the sum of the parts.

The question we should ask ourselves is not how we cling to our old, analog profession but how we can benefit and flourish in a world where computers are better thinkers, problem solvers and creators.